 | | Corrections to LUGNET Sets Database.
|
|
I've been browsing the LUGNET sets database recently, and found a few omissions and changes that need to be made in the early Samsonite sets. Who do I contact to correct these? Here are what needs changing: The following sets list 1967 as the start (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Corrections to LUGNET Sets Database.
|
|
(...) Over the past couple of months, Joshua has been doing immensely great amounts of work in the DB, especially in the older sets. So this would fall into his area of recent expertise. But if he doesn't want to (it's all volunteer, keep in mind) (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Corrections to LUGNET Sets Database.
|
|
(...) Note that they list "+1967", short-hand for "1967 is the earliest reference we currently have. I'm glad you noticed them. You're much more expert than I am to comment on the release date. The "+" is specifically there to make it stand out and (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Corrections to LUGNET Sets Database.
|
|
(...) Thanks for the reply Joshua (and thanks especially for all the work in keeping the databases updated!). The next thread will go to lugnet.admin.database. I studied that page (from the supposed 1961 Samsonite Catalog) on the website. I assume (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Corrections to LUGNET Sets Database.
|
|
[Followups to lugnet.admin.database] Gary, did you ever manage to check the mint-condition copy of this scan? -- joshua (...) (26 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
