 | | New S@H Catalog Discrepancies :) —David Eaton
|
| | | Caption for 10040 Black Seas Barracuda (p.3): "LEGO fans were asked to vote for the LEGO Legend they most wanted to see return - and the Black Seas Barracuda was the #1 choice!" Caption for the Legends page (p.60): "A recent online poll said that (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog Discrepancies :) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | (...) Well considering that the flag and torso logos are done in the old elongated shape rather than the new 'same as shield' shape, I would say that those are fact the original images used for the set in 1986. -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog Discrepancies :) —Kevin Johnston
|
| | | | | In lugnet.general, David Eaton writes: *snip* (...) Isn't "hard to find" S@H-code for "not at retail?" (Either not at all, or hardly at all in the case of discontinued sets.) A retail appearance per se wouldn't surprise me, since many LD sets that (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog Discrepancies :) —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) I've always found that "hard to find" means only at select stores-- like the Rebel Blockade Runner and Sopwith Camel. I'm hoping the same will be true for the 10026... (...) Yeah, I'd like it to come to retail, but then again, I want (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog Discrepancies :) —Bruce Hietbrink
|
| | | | (...) I saw that one as well. They tend to call things "New!" for about a year.* I wonder if that "New!" is meant to refer to the Jedi Adventure Kit? Those sets were all released in 2002 so they could be called "New!" by the normal S@H usage. Bruce (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog Discrepancies :) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, that's why I checked the Spring and Summer catalogs for 2002 as well, which both have the Imperial Shuttle but don't call it "New!" (since it came out in... what? 2000? Or was it 2001?) Anyway, long past time for it to be called "New!". (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
