Subject:
|
Re: New S@H Catalog Discrepancies :)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:57:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
334 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Eaton writes:
> And I also noticed that the Imperial Shuttle (7166, p. 14/15) is labelled
> "NEW!".
I saw that one as well. They tend to call things "New!" for about a year.*
I wonder if that "New!" is meant to refer to the Jedi Adventure Kit? Those
sets were all released in 2002 so they could be called "New!" by the normal
S@H usage.
Bruce
*I do wish they'd say "New" only on those sets that were new since the last
catalog as it would be easier to figure out what was where.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New S@H Catalog Discrepancies :)
|
| (...) Yeah, that's why I checked the Spring and Summer catalogs for 2002 as well, which both have the Imperial Shuttle but don't call it "New!" (since it came out in... what? 2000? Or was it 2001?) Anyway, long past time for it to be called "New!". (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | New S@H Catalog Discrepancies :)
|
| Caption for 10040 Black Seas Barracuda (p.3): "LEGO fans were asked to vote for the LEGO Legend they most wanted to see return - and the Black Seas Barracuda was the #1 choice!" Caption for the Legends page (p.60): "A recent online poll said that (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
