 | | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
"Holger Matthes" <matthes@fh-aachen.de> wrote in message news:H3r4D0.4Kw@lugnet.com... (...) Are we supposed to be discussing leaked information on Lugnet? I thought it was expressly forbidden (somewhere in this thread (URL) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) (URL) only that confidential information should not be disclosed in the public forum that is LUGNET. Have there been any indications that this information is confidential? Catalog scans are common enough---it's only if the catalog was (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) It looked to me like a dealer's catalogue. I haven't seen one of those before, certainly not in German, but a true catalogue for public consumption would look very different than one that simply shows off the products for potential market (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) I have seen one dealer's catalog last year at a local toy shop, and it's pretty much like this (or even simpler in looks). There are lots of appendixes with prices on the last pages. Pedro (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) *finds can opener* *finds Can of Worms* Here we go... At what point does LEGO/LUGNET realize the futility of this? I've been reading LUGNET for 4 years now, and every fall/winter this has happened. Somebody (usually in Europe, but not always) (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
"Jason Maxwell" <jhmaxwell@attbi.com> wrote in message news:H3sHH9.L9x@lugnet.com... (...) I am playing devil's advocate -- in 1999 (or was it 2000?) I was the one who leaked the information first on Lugnet and got a right ear-full from Suz, and (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.general)
|
