 | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic —Blake Kunisch
|
| | | (...) Unfortunately, the idiotic way the people at Geocities do it (AFAIK), is that they determine how much bandwidth PER HOUR you are allowed to use, based on how much you are given per month. So if you have one bad hour, despite having previous (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic —Matt Hein
|
| | | | (...) Per day updates would be a LOT better than on a hourly basis. The one thing I don't understand I why they have to shut down the site after many slow hours, in spite of one fast hour. What's up with that, anyway? Maybe It's all just a scam to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | (...) It's just a Yahoo! plow! Whatever you do don't bother paying for the extra service. Screw them! You can set up a mirror site at www.tripod.com to help offset your "this site is out...". I've had this problem before with yahoo and finally just (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | (...) [...] (...) Better yet, move it somewhere without ads. When I see a geocities or tripod site advertised on Lugnet, I usually don't bother visiting it at all, unless the description is extremely enticing. I especially hate tripod - at least the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | [snip] (...) Actually you would be better off going to FortuneCity. You get 100MB of space and there are no annoying pop-up ads. There is an small banner inserted at the top of all your pages but it is no big deal compared to pop-ups. For an example (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic —Adam Angle
|
| | | | (...) No annoying pop-ups? What are all those things that come up when I go to the site then? (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) space (...) the (...) How odd? I do not get any. I am using Netscape 4.61 with cookies disabled. Maybe that has something to do with it. Oh well, it is still 100MB of space which is better than the other free sites. -Mike Petrucelli (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic —Adam Angle
|
| | | | (...) Agreed, 100MB is still great no matter how one looks at it. (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | (...) You need to pay attention to the bandwidth allowance. Webspace is nice, but it's not as important as the traffic capacity, especially if your webhost will temporarily shut your site down or require extra fees if you exceed your allowance. If (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
