| |
Actually, it's "LEGO Bricks or Toys" as seen here on the back of a 1981
catalog:
http://www.peeron.com/tmp/lego.JPG
(how often do i get to correct both my husband *and* larry p?)
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Dan Boger writes:
>
> > Dave Schuler wrote:
> >
> > > One of my coworkers (who doesn't know of my little ABS addiction) mentioned
> > > off-handedly that his brother, while in college for architecture, used to
> > > build "really complex bridges and things out of LEGO." I'm not anal about
> > > "LEGO" versus "LEGOs," but this marks the absolute first time I've ever
> > > heard any non-AFOL refer to LEGO correctly. Wacky.
> >
> > heh, I'm not anal about it, but isn't the proper use "LEGO Bricks"?
>
>
> IANAE(1) but I think it's actually "LEGO brand building bricks" :-)
>
> 1 - I am not anal either
>
> tongue set firmly in cheek. FUT set firmly to ot.f.
>
> ++Lar
>
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Proper usage of "LEGO"
|
| (...) Actually you not only corrected their misteak, you did it "At The Same Time", an extreme rarity AND you had proof to back you up. Well done! gd&r Thanx, Mark Millere LUGnet # 525 Visit Milissa's LEGO store, Millere's Spares (URL) (23 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
