Subject:
|
Re: Proper usage of "LEGO"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 23:00:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
456 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:GI0zED.1vy@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.general, Dan Boger writes:
> > Dave Schuler wrote:
> > > One of my coworkers (who doesn't know of my little ABS addiction) • mentioned
> > > off-handedly that his brother, while in college for architecture, used • to
> > > build "really complex bridges and things out of LEGO." I'm not anal • about
> > > "LEGO" versus "LEGOs," but this marks the absolute first time I've ever
> > > heard any non-AFOL refer to LEGO correctly. Wacky.
> >
> > heh, I'm not anal about it, but isn't the proper use "LEGO Bricks"?
>
> IANAE(1) but I think it's actually "LEGO brand building bricks" :-)
>
> 1 - I am not anal either
>
> tongue set firmly in cheek. FUT set firmly to ot.f.
>
> ++Lar
I am pretty sure it is Lego Bricks, since they have a patent and all.
--
Markham Carroll
Who needs sanity when you have iNsAniTy?!
All your Lego base are belong to us!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
