 | | Re: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Joe Davenport
|
| | | Excellent idea for the name. Thanks for the suggestions. I had to print the 'windows' off a laser printer since I don't have the Stenna Ferry kit. :-( Joe (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Thought you might like that twist on your last name... :-) (...) Sacriledge. Oh well, it's worth it. TLG SHOULD sell those for microfig work... I feel my Purity slipping. Was there ever a more comprehensive Purity Test (like we all took back (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Parts II & III here... (URL) a purity test (at least, that's one of the things that inspired the survey). But it would sure be cool to see real purity test with numbers you could add up and get a score. :) --Todd (25 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Of course the high school version basically served as a guide to what sorts of trouble one could get into... I had just about gotten to 100 by the time I graduated. (25 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —John Cromer
|
| | | | | | (...) Back in 1996, Kevin John Stefan posted a LEGO Purity Test to RTL. Herewith, I reproduce it as posted: ---...--- Begin included posting from Kevin ---...--- Recently, I've been doing some major-league surfing on the Web (when Netscape isn't (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | | On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 22:50:56 GMT, "John Cromer" <cro@astro.caltech.edu> wrote: <quoted test snipped> (...) That was fun. And I just went to Dejanews to read the whole thread on David Roth. What a load of crap _that_ was. :-) -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) It was distressing, at the time. But it was much more lighthearted than the whole Mandroid thing. Or Minx's departure. In one way, it's funny to think a lot of people (myself included) were willing to believe that some kid built a 20-foot long (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | Wow, what a bunch of skeletons in that closet. A very interesting read on both patron m. and patron r. -- I enjoy viewing a train accident as much as anyone else, I guess. It's funny that I always passed over those threads before. I do remember (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I remember her too, but am vague on the departure. Maybe I missed that when I wasn't reading RTL for some time (still aren't), what happened? Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 New Lugnet Newsgroup? (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | | (...) I've never taken one of these before, so I was wondering if you are more "Lego Pure" the lower the percentage. For reference, I got a 35% (If I did it correctly) Jeff (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | | | | (...) You may have made the same mistake I made - It says to total up the *no* answers and divide by 112. If you just kept track of the number you answered *yes*, then subtract that from 112 before you divide. I got a 48% pure. --Bram Bram Lambrecht (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Sounds like I did it correctly, but I'm still wondering if a Lower percentage is more or less pure. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | My favorite: (...) Steve (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) There used to be one, floating around. Pretty much strictly lifted from the standard Purity Test, of course. Steve (25 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
