Subject:
|
Re: Et in Arcadia Lego Redux (New and Improved)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 12:26:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
635 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Juergen Stuber writes:
> "Paul Hartzog" <panarchy23@yahoo.com> writes:
> >
> > For serious browsers only (IE5 or Netscape 6)
>
> I find it really childish to shut out people for some lousy frames.
Aw now, that's not very nice.
And IIRC, iframes and ilayers(not sure if Paul used this or not for NS
users) have been around at least since version 4 of both browsers. So the
frame has nothing to do with it.
Anyway it's his site and he can create it anyway he wants. If people can't
get to it, tough for them. If the users don't see it exactly how he wants
it, tough for him.
That's the problem with web design. If you want to do anything even
remotely cool, you're screwed. HTML wasn't developed with design in mind.
BTW - I'm not particularily fond of the frame myself, but the rest looks
mighty good.
---SteveR
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Et in Arcadia Lego Redux (New and Improved)
|
| (...) At least my Netscape 4.76 doesn't show them, he shows the text in the noframes element which is not very helpful, to say the least (in hindsight it is probably because Javascript is turned off). (...) He can, but it's not nice. (...) Why be (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Et in Arcadia Lego Redux (New and Improved)
|
| (...) I find it really childish to shut out people for some lousy frames. Why can't you at least put in a link to the frame inside the noframes element instead of insulting people by demanding that they install some particular browser that they (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
