| |
In lugnet.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> >
> > > I do not see what bashing sellers for making a profit has to do with class
> > > warfare?
> >
> > Was that a question? In other words, are you asking *us* if *you* see it
> > that way? How should we know what you think, if you don't know yourself?
>
> It was rhetorical - but I see your point.
Can I ask what this has to do with LEGO?
FUT to lugnet.off-topic.debate, something you two should know by now to have
done yourselves.
eric
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
|
| (...) Eric, I was in debate, but I moved it here as I understand that is where it belongs: (URL) If you had picked “apart the rest of the message instead of acting like some wisecrack”(1) perhaps you would have seen that. :-) Scott A (1) Using Peter (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
|
| (...) It was rhetorical - but I see your point. (...) Nope, it shows that you do not understand what class warfare(1) is. It implies that Lego sellers are of a different social or economic class from Lego buyers - do you really think that is that (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
