Subject:
|
Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:21:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
365 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Kyle D. Jackson writes:
> > WARNING! Compartmentalized Dork-dom ahead! ;]
> >
> > Larry, I'm not sure why you're so convinced this isn't a .general
> > topic. The discussion was about general "market goings-on" for
> > LEGO.
>
> It looked (to me) like it was veering off into class warfare, that is,
> bashing sellers for making a profit. That, in my opinion, is .debate fodder.
I do not see what bashing sellers for making a profit has to do with class
warfare? Saying that they use economic might, or their social class to do so
without good reason may well be. But that is just the way of the world. I do
not rate sellers as being a social or economic class above anyone? Should
lego only be sold on a quota system?
Scott A
>
> However I was wrong about that veer and I have said so already.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
|
| (...) It was rhetorical - but I see your point. (...) Nope, it shows that you do not understand what class warfare(1) is. It implies that Lego sellers are of a different social or economic class from Lego buyers - do you really think that is that (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
