 | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Rich Thompson
|
| | | Matthew misses the point. He was a guest here. He violated the ToS, regardless or his opinion. This is a humble dictatorship, IMHO, and if Todd says go...GO! Matthew has other options to contribute to the Lego community and I would hope he would be (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Rich Thompson
|
| | | | Sadly, Matthew has proven my point. He wishes to do as he likes on someone else's playground and wonders why people become irritated (and amused to wit). I (according to the ToS) chose to be a part of this humble dictatorship for the privledge of (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Rich Thompson
|
| | | | Matthew, this repetition quickly becomes boring. You continue to post in a place where you have been banned. You were banned for violation of the ToS. It does not matter if you were banned for being ugly, inept, funny-looking, or too handsome. You (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Rich Thompson
|
| | | | Hmmm, a clever twist of my meaning, but still you miss the point. You have again failed to convince me of your "right" to post on a private server owned by an individual. I think (again, my opinion) everyone does understand that this is a private (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
