Subject:
|
Re: Challenge
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:51:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
447 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:44:10 GMT, "Will Hess" <willhess@simflex.com>
wrote:
> I'm thinking of a modern (minifig era) Lego element that cannot be attached to
> any other Lego element. Sure, there might be more than one but I wonder how
> long it will take for someone to guess mine :-)
>
> I'll post my answer tomorrow if nobody guesses it.
>
> Have fun,
> Will
In addition to the other already posted answers, I'd add the net
element. It can be tied to other elements, but I'm not sure if that
counts as being attached or not. String might count also.
Jeff Christner
Visit Sixby Fire Tech at - http://members.aol.com/regult/
Help support my LEGO habit. Ship by rail.
Visit http://www.nscorp.com/ to find out how.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Challenge
|
| (...) No to string (it is definately attached to hooks and reels) but the net is a possibility. Would someone else like to weigh in on this one? Will Lego Beach Fire and Rescue: www.crosswinds.net/~hokie Bricksburg Depot: (URL) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Challenge
|
| I'm thinking of a modern (minifig era) Lego element that cannot be attached to any other Lego element. Sure, there might be more than one but I wonder how long it will take for someone to guess mine :-) I'll post my answer tomorrow if nobody guesses (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.general)
|
22 Messages in This Thread: ![Challenge -Will Hess (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Challenge -John Gerlach (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Stephen F. Roberts (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Will Hess (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Lawrence Wilkes (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Will Hess (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Kenneth A. Drumm, Ph.D. (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Challenge -David Eaton (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Will Hess (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Jeff Johnston (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Sheree Rosenkrantz (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Will Hess (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Frank Filz (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Sheree Rosenkrantz (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Martin Scragg (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -David Eaton (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Will Hess (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Frank Filz (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Will Hess (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Matt Brooks (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Challenge -Frank Filz (11-Jan-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|