 | | Re: Okay... I'm lost here. —Simon Denscombe
|
| | | (...) If they are micro-fig scale then what are the small non-minifig promo polybags then? Do I have to invent the term milli-fig scale? Millifig scale proposal: Uses a 2x2x1 45 degree slope piece as a window Uses the inverted piece as part of a (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay... I'm lost here. —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) I wasn't aware of them. I thought usage of "microfig" (as well as "minifig") is pretty much unofficial. Has "microfig" been used in Lego marketing already? (...) It's my understanding that physical scale is variable and up to the modeller. (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Okay... I'm lost here. —Simon Denscombe
|
| | | | | | (...) No, it's a fan-based term. (...) (URL) ath=(URL) Those are also good examples of microfig-scale. Well, compared with the Star Wars models they are huge so what is micro-fig scale? (...) Well, I only have a few basic bricks at the moment so I (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay... I'm lost here. —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, that's a relief. (...) The scale itself is not fixed, per se. It's really very arbitrary. I suppose the Micromachines example was valid; the MM Star Wars Imperial Death Star is the same length as the MM Aliens APC. One's big enough to (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Okay... I'm lost here. —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | (...) I always thought that "microfig scale" refered to anything that was too small for Minifigs. Jeff (26 years ago, 1-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Okay... I'm lost here. —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) Just a smart-alec guess here, but would they be called.... Modulex scale? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 1-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Okay... I'm lost here. —Simon Denscombe
|
| | | | (...) Well, I suppose that's the most obvious! :-) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
