| |
> Also a thought on LegOz organisation...instead of states, how about • regions:
> QLD and NT => northern
> NSW and ACT => Central
> Tas and Vic => Southern
> WA and SA => Western
> NZ and other countries in region => Eastern
I think this might be a slightly heavy-weight organisation for the numbers
of people involved! For example, I don't there are enough Qlders and NTers
for a separate Northern group. Also, unless people live within 1-2 hours
drive of each other, they are unlikely to be able to get together anyway. I
really think that regional groups have to be more city-based than
state-based for any kind of real-life interaction.
As "proof", I point to the lugnet.loc.au.* newsgroups. Other than the AU
group itself, Sydney is the only group with any significant traffic levels;
other cities get the odd spurt of enthusiasm but no really sustainable
levels of traffic. My interpretation of this is that, apart from Sydney, the
rest of us are fairly thinly spread across the country.
Why not just start with LegOz for all Australia (and any of our neighbours
who want to be involved)? If/when regional clusters of people find
themselves getting together (either electronically through a lugnet group or
in real-life), then consider forming a subgroup (e.g. Studs). I think that's
a simpler and more organic approach than establishing a large hierarchy
that's not sustainable.
Kerry
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
