To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 17314
17313  |  17315
Subject: 
Re: Off Topic, but amusing ; )
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 11 Apr 2000 05:30:43 GMT
Viewed: 
1239 times
  
Matthew Miller wrote:

Mike Poindexter <lego@poindexter.cc> wrote:
By that rationale, you could make monorail track and they wouldn't care.  I
would bet that the legal papers would come FEDEX if you tried, though.  A
trademark that isn't planned to be used again is still something that is an
option and people like to protect their options.  They might come out with
Blacktron III, although I doubt it.  Still, losing the ability to do it
would be a concern for them.

First, "m-tron" is not a registered trademark (neither is "m tron", "mtron",
or "m:tron"). But even if it were, trademarks need to be periodically
renewed, and cannot be renewed if they're not actively being used in
commerce.

Furthermore, if Lego had such a trademark, it would certainly be within
class 28, Toys and Sporting goods. Any other commercial use would be
perfectly legitimate. And so would non-related non-commercial use, for that
matter.

Class 28?  I didn't know the world had been divided so...rationally.  :)  Maybe
we need new acronyms to add to IANAL:  "IASLK" (I Am Somewhat Legalistically
(Jurisprudentially?) Knowledgeable") or "IAIAL:NJP" (I Am Indeed A Lawyer: No
Jokes, Please)?

This could get convoluted.  Perhaps that's fitting?  <gd&r>

best

LFB

XFUT-> o-t.fun



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Off Topic, but amusing ; )
 
(...) or IAIAL+IAIYAWS (I am indeed a lawyer + I am invoicing you as we speak) -pete.w (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Off Topic, but amusing ; )
 
(...) I'm Not A Lawyer But I've Researched Trademark Law Because It's An Issue Which Affects The Internet A Lot And That's Something I Care About. :) It's not the world which has been divided, necessarily, but the U.S. trademark namespace. (Similar (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Off Topic, but amusing ; )
 
(...) First, "m-tron" is not a registered trademark (neither is "m tron", "mtron", or "m:tron"). But even if it were, trademarks need to be periodically renewed, and cannot be renewed if they're not actively being used in commerce. Furthermore, if (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)  

15 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR