 | | Re: Interview with Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen
|
|
(...) Well, the phrasing is awkward, but I read it as "working for Lego last year was not fun because of the 1000 people laid off, now that we are past that, it is again fun to work for Lego". More (programable) electronic bricks sounds like fun (so (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Interview with Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen
|
|
(...) Ever play the game "Complete the Sentence"? After laying off 1000 last year, it is again fun to working for Lego. Again to anticipate next year, 1000 more go not without fun. After laying off 1000 last year, it is again fun to working for (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Interview with Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen
|
|
(...) 2000 in 2000, eh? :-( ++Lar (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Interview with Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen
|
|
(...) Ambiguity is half the fun in playing the complete-the-sentence game (especially on CEO quotage-fodder :-). ...We forsee for this year 2000 to become history with strong results. ...To forsee continued fun, for this year, 2000, which we (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interview with Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen
|
|
(...) Todd, these are funny. Are you running them through Babelfish, perhaps? Or does your twisted mind come up with these phrasings on its own? (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interview with Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen
|
|
(...) Thought them up while washing some dishes. BTW, I love Babelfish for that sort of thing, and I've noticed that it mangles English->Italian->English very nicely. --Todd (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interview with Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen
|
|
(...) This is exactly what I meant. Thanks Frank. (...) I think the interview suggests more supplementary packs rather bulk sales of bricks. (...) Christian (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
