 | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | Hi Mike, (...) We had five trains and six(maybe seven) moters running on the layout without any significant problems. Our DCC system could only support five addresses. (...) My GP-35 had two moters attached to it, both assigned to the same address. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Tom Cook
|
| | | | | I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technical we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | (...) Could you imagine the mess ten trains would have made? :) It was bad enough with three trains, four trains was crazy, and five was plain insane. We had some spectacular crashes, the scariest of which was Rich's shunter doing a full-speed (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | | On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 17:14:33 GMT Christopher Tracey <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote concerning 'Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)': (...) I guess it's my job to take responsability for that one - I was driving the shunter (I (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | | (...) ...The 'other 5' could be set to 'fixed speeds' while we played with the first 5. I had the best luck controlling two trains on one loop when I left one at a fixed speed and controlled the other as needed (course, helps if u pay attention :-) (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | | (...) What Chris didn't see was the initial look of horror on my face, after not being there all day, stuck at work, thinking of nothing all day but being there to help tear down and collect my pieces, only to see one of my better creations lately (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | (...) ...Lol! yes, u got there just before another problem with DCC happened. The shunter was driving a small cargo train and rear ended a stationary train rite on a curve. The shunter and a number of cars took a tumble and the shunter ended up in a (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Tom Cook
|
| | | | I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technically we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | OK, now where's that website with all the info on how to build it? ;-) I hope you do a "DCC for Dummies", an EE I am NOT. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my personal views with my (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | (...) (URL) instructions seem strait forward enuf... tho I'm still a bit nervous about soldering near a LEGO motor... Im trying to convince Tom to make a business out of this 'for a nominal fee' :-) (...) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —James Powell
|
| | | | (...) hope (...) I'd be willing to do the mechanical changes. My suggestion would be to get some Indium based solder rather than even 60-40. I use some made by Carrs in the UK, and have no problems with it...the flux is hydrofloric acid though...so (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
