 | | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
(...) I would say more cost effective than having lawyers sic'd on em.. The way they get about someone invading their rights, they should expect the same from someone who's rights they violate with this. Granted it's not their fault in some (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
Mookie <Mookie1@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:38905CA0.1E3284...att.net... (...) I would say not. Is a single AFOL going to sue TLC? No way! They already have lawyers on salary, so it isn't going to run up their bills as fast as the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
(...) I don't want to start a range war or anything but I DO want to say that, whatever TLC's other faults, I don't see their lawyers as NEARLY as bad as a lot of other firms. I really feel their fair play policy is a model of reasonableness and we (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
(...) That's true--I wasn't very precise in wording my earlier post, either. TLC lawyers are indeed remarkably cool about web-posting images and scans. I was referring more to materials that they decide are "off limits" and the vigor with which they (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
Mike Poindexter wrote in message ... (...) route (...) The (...) just (...) Just (...) to (...) Actually, I think if you had a good solid case (which I think this particular instance is), I think you'd find you would do quite well. I don't know (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Bang Bang (was Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
Dave(bang) said: (...) And I'll see your ! and raise you one. Amen!! (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Bang Bang (was Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
(...) D'oh! Too rich for my blood. I'm out! Dave. (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
