Subject:
|
Re: For Your Eyes Only !!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 14:12:46 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.com=spamcake=
|
Viewed:
|
664 times
|
| |
|
|
leggomylego wrote:
>
> Also, consider the fact of how EASY it would be to recreate this thing form
> parts we all have laying around.
Ah. Interesting. When does something shade over from being a design or
decoration to a work of art?
Theoretically, if I copy a work of art, even if I get it exactly right,
it's a forgery... If Lego Bricks are the medium, is that still true? Is
it art because the artist says so?
This whole thing has just been discussed at length in .debate but I
don't think any satisfactory conclusion has been reached.
--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: For Your Eyes Only !!!
|
| (...) I would say any MOC could be considered a work of art. It is the "artist" who puts the pieces in a certain arrangement, creating a new piece out of other smaller pieces. (...) True a person's reproduction would be a forgery, but unless someone (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: For Your Eyes Only !!!
|
| Also, consider the fact of how EASY it would be to recreate this thing form parts we all have laying around. I would guesstimate only 2000 pieces in the work. If you printed a nice quality copy of the auction list, I think it would be easy enough to (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
