 | | why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Todd Lehman
|
| | | Kevin Loch has graciously agreed to host the JPEG files for the 1999 catalog. Image links at (URL) been updated to point to the new directories on Kevin's server www.kl.net, so this should be a mostly-transparent changepoint. The JPEGs do still (...) (26 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Robert M. Dye
|
| | | | | I would say you ought to be forwarding all this info to the people at LEGO, whatever contacts you have there. You are essentially providing them with free advertising, and with this info in such hight demand, they'd have to be fools not to consider (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Jim Baker
|
| | | | | Also sprach Todd Lehman: : Anyway, I sure didn't expect there to be 2000 people per day accessing these : 1999 catalog images -- pushing the bandwidth out of the hundreds-of- : Megabytes-per-day range and into the Gigabytes-per-day range. And still (...) (26 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) There were something like ~16,000 hits on the JPEG images, from ~2000 unique IP addresses... --Todd (26 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | (...) Take into account that a lot of those hits probably were from Star Wars fans that are not necessarily lego fans. I sent the 1999 url to a friend who appreciates lego, tho doesn't own any sets yet, but loves Star Wars, and plans to buy SW lego (...) (26 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Jim Baker
|
| | | | | | | Also sprach Todd Lehman: : There were something like ~16,000 hits on the JPEG images, from ~2000 unique : IP addresses... <boggle> / _ _ / _ _ I think animal testing is a terrible idea; they get all ()(-(//((-/ nervous and give the wrong answers. (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) At least three of which were me. :) (26 years ago, 10-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Wow. All I can say is thanks a bunch for hosting them while you could. Do we need to pass the hat? :-) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) I've been willing to pay my dues for a while now. :) Especially if I can go ahead and lock in a prime piece of baseplate. (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Ya, me too. I heard offline that this bandwidth bill was not that much scratch, it was just the trendline that was worrisome. Or so the rumor said. (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) It would have cost ~$500/month if it had continued at that bandwidth rate. Obviously it would be going down after the 1999 catalogs appear in more stores, but on the other hand it could also have gone up by 5x or more if the readership of (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —David Zorn
|
| | | | | | Todd and group, I need your help. Are my posts showing up on your newsreader or only mine? I have posted numerous times to RTL lately, they show up in my reader but not on dejanews. I posted the following note on 12/8/98 at 10:30pm with no (...) (26 years ago, 10-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | Janet Zorn wrote in message ... (...) You cannot see the messages posted to Lugnet in anywhere except from Lugnet itself. Lugnet is a privately owned disscussion group, and not connected to usenet in anyway. The only technical similarity is they (...) (26 years ago, 10-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved —David Zorn
|
| | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message <366cc340.28054619@l...et.com>... : :Kevin Loch has graciously agreed to host the JPEG files for the 1999 :catalog. Image links at : : (URL) been updated to point to the new directories on Kevin's server :www.kl.net, so (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
