 | | Re: using "lego" in domain names —Paul Davidson
|
| | | Just wait until someone tries trademarking all the integers. :) (and out of curiosity, do you have some handy-dandy way of searching the trademark databases?) -- Paul Davidson, aka Tinman www.theforce.net | Your Daily Dose of Star Wars (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: using "lego" in domain names —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah. The USPTO has a searchable database at <URL:(URL). There's also a few others which provide prettier front ends to the same data. (May be slightly out-of-date, though.) <URL:(URL) has a nice one that returns a lot of useful information in (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: using "lego" in domain names —Glynis Irwin
|
| | | | | | (...) It's always nice to hear when people are using our databases and finding them useful. A note on currency of data though, just so you know. Our information comes directly from data tapes from the US PTO and is updated weekly. This information (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: using "lego" in domain names —Christopher Lannan
|
| | | | | (...) There is a funny article on the www.theonion.com archives page that reports that Microsoft trademarked 1s and 0s stating that all of their code used them. It says that Apple had to start making pedal powered, vinyl disk using Macs because they (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: using "lego" in domain names —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) Intel tried it with 586 I belive. They couldn't get a trade make so they called it the pentium instead. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
