Subject:
|
Re: Juniorization -- too simple even for kids?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:15:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
886 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, John J. Ladasky Jr. wrote:
> ... And
> since the choking warnings are directed at kids younger than my son, we
> wouldn't have a leg to stand on in court.
That seems backwards. It seems like you'd have *more* of a leg to stand on,
because the warning *should* have addressed your child, and didn't.
Then again, I've heard that people shouldn't post "Beware of Dog" signs in their
yard, because if their dog bites someone, the signs put them in a worse
position--they obviously knew the dog was dangerous, and didn't take sufficient
precautions.
All this civil-legal stuff makes my head spin.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Juniorization -- too simple even for kids?
|
| Hi, Mike, Let's skip to the end of your post first... (...) Ouch! Is that any way to talk to a guy to whom you're simultaneously trying to sell 48 black 2 X 3 inverse 33-degree slopes? 8^) I'll have to say that I get this a lot. "You have an (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
