Subject:
|
Re: LEGO in Toy Story 2?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 04:34:28 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera=antispam=.com
|
Viewed:
|
622 times
|
| |
|
|
When I wrote that, I hadn't seen the movie, but I have now, and I agree
with Mr. Braun... no way would one tail swipe have wrecked a LEGO house.
I'm worried that I am an Al if I'm not careful (although I can't see
stealing from a garage sale...).
Mr L F Braun wrote:
>
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > Every one of those toy brands no doubt paid for product placement (after
> > all, potatohead and etchasketch sales went way up.). Paying for
> > placement is a typical move.
> >
> > No doubt TLG wouldn't pay... that hubris thing again.
>
> Well, maybe the designers didn't make them LEGO or with underside tubes
> because they knew that genuine LEGO just isn't that easy to knock over and
> break? :)
>
> best,
>
> Lindsay
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO in Toy Story 2?
|
| (...) Well, maybe the designers didn't make them LEGO or with underside tubes because they knew that genuine LEGO just isn't that easy to knock over and break? :) best, Lindsay (25 years ago, 28-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
