Subject:
|
Re: LEGO in Toy Story 2?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 28 Nov 1999 23:48:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
693 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Every one of those toy brands no doubt paid for product placement (after
> all, potatohead and etchasketch sales went way up.). Paying for
> placement is a typical move.
>
> No doubt TLG wouldn't pay... that hubris thing again.
Well, maybe the designers didn't make them LEGO or with underside tubes
because they knew that genuine LEGO just isn't that easy to knock over and
break? :)
best,
Lindsay
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO in Toy Story 2?
|
| When I wrote that, I hadn't seen the movie, but I have now, and I agree with Mr. Braun... no way would one tail swipe have wrecked a LEGO house. I'm worried that I am an Al if I'm not careful (although I can't see stealing from a garage sale...). (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO in Toy Story 2?
|
| Every one of those toy brands no doubt paid for product placement (after all, potatohead and etchasketch sales went way up.). Paying for placement is a typical move. No doubt TLG wouldn't pay... that hubris thing again. (25 years ago, 25-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
