|
|
 | | Re: Legowiki
|
| (...) [...] Hi, I agree Christian's point of view on the legowiki subject and hope being able to contribute in the near future. Didier (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Legowiki
|
| (...) Wikipedia is a generic encyclopedia. Terms like "SNOT" or "BURP" might be out of place there, as they are too specific. (...) Why not? > Or just information on (...) Well, it could be an organized form of the the information key postings on (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Legowiki
|
| (...) One more point that just popped into my head: External linking. As a Wiki can not and will not replace places like Peeron, a Lego Wiki would need a simple, but powerful way of linking to set and part references. I have not tried to set up a (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Legowiki
|
| (...) Hi, Gary, Two answers for this: 1. What is a Wiki? A Wiki is a kind of "web in a box". The people who provide content can easily create and edit pages with information, and can equally edit links between these. Think of it as an encyclopedia, (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Legowiki
|
| (...) Any of those names are fine by me as long as the engines find them, I guess I like BrickWiki (or WikiBricky, because it rhymes...) best... But I'm just a gadfly. (...) *Many* parts have never been implemented. WRT to a wiki, probably this one (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
|
