 | | Re: 4679 Variations (was Re: What a trip I had to Markville!)
|
|
(...) Thanks for posting those Tim. The one in St. Catharines had 2 2714's. I don't know if there are more there. The store clerk found the 2 I bought in their store room (not on the floor). Benjamin Medinets (21 years ago, 6-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Most redundant Lego part
|
|
(...) Yes, but then TLG would need to create 1x4x4 arches if you want to make a colonnade with 1x5x4 (half arches) and the 1x4 arches. Or perhaps a 1x4x3 arch to go along with the 1x12x3 arches in a colonnade. Or if you wanted 1x6x2 arches with the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | LEGO at war in Iraq...
|
|
Found this on my daily browse of national news sites. (URL) Kingsley (21 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Most redundant Lego part
|
|
(...) Functionally yes, aesthetically no. If you're abutting 1x6x2 and 1x4 arches (in a colonade say - (URL) using 1x4 arches with 1x1 bricks to make up the height is just not as pleasing as using 1x4x2 arches - sorry but I don't like the extra seam (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Parts I'd like to see
|
|
I know there was a thread a while back in which people listed parts they'd like to see made. I didn't have any luck with searching (is finding things on LUGNET hard for anyone else?), so I thought I'd start a new thread about it with a part I was (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Most redundant Lego part
|
|
"M. Moolhuysen" <moom@NOSPAM-chello.nl> wrote in message news:I6KGpB.1F5v@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) Wall 3 x (...) studs wide (...) intersecting (...) the (...) Lattice (...) parts (...) Dark (...) Slopes, (...) OK so its a bit juniorised but (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 4679 Variations (was Re: What a trip I had to Markville!)
|
|
Said thing is around Toronto only the 3xxx variety have I seen yet, and I hit 3-4 TRU and they only have the three strap versions, MANY MANY but only three strap versions, must been unlucky town!! (21 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | 4679 Variations (was Re: What a trip I had to Markville!)
|
|
(...) An update to the previously stated. I now have 3 4679's with different serial numbers. The third is 2814, and it is closely related to 2714 in contents. It also has old grey's in the tub. Here's my pix of a 2714, and a 2814 stamped combo after (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Most stunning motorbike ever?!?
|
|
(...) Hi David! (...) I was looking at the rear set up on the bike and I'm not sure how "strong" it was. I know any set issued has to at least have the strength test passed. So maybe it was just a fan. Who knows. It was just fantastic that's all I (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Most stunning motorbike ever?!?
|
|
(...) It would admittedly be pretty awesome! Although I wonder if they've "learned their lesson" with chrome-intensive sets on the UCS Naboo Fighter. Granted I think this would do better than the Naboo Fighter, but it seemed like that set just kinda (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
