 | | Re: Giant Brickshelf images...
|
|
(...) I think it would make a BIG difference if more 'large pic' posters would just CROP their pics a lot more, unless of course it's a story & the background is part of it. Otherwise I don't need to see those pillows in the baskground. Jeff (23 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Giant Brickshelf images...
|
|
Kevin, The multi-megapixel camera dumps onto Brickshelf are becoming an epidemic. I'm sure most people don't have the patience to wait for a blurry 3 megapixel shot of a tiny MOC to load. Is there any chance you could resample pics above a certain (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bridge Elements Won't Click
|
|
(...) Mine click together side by side just fine. But the pic out of peeron you linked to isn't what mine look like. Mine have a peg on the tops, centered between all 4 studs on the top. The pegs fit inside the underside of bricks fine, but you (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Another "borrowed" picture...
|
|
(...) Never been my intend to dis The Lego Group. If you look at any of my post I have always stated that LEGO is a TOY and we (adults) need to sometimes be reminded of this fact. We cry we bionicle, jack stone, Harry porter, and other jr. toys came (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Another "borrowed" picture
|
|
(...) *cough* *cough* Cheapo site? What the... never mind. Dang, I would gladly make my site slow to make the design that good. But aside from that, I'm with you, Bram. I think that this recent rage of taking other people's photos and resubmitting (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Another "borrowed" picture...
|
|
(...) I say way to stick to your guns, Bram. I understand what everyone else is saying, but at the same time, people need to put themselves in your shoes. I'm sorry your MOCs have been the target of image theft repeatedly, and I'm sure it's (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Another "borrowed" picture...
|
|
(...) I have started to do so in some cases: (URL) others... It's a significant amount of extra work to add the watermark, though, and it clutters the image, especially if I should start adding my URL too... Amd even if I watermark all my new work, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Another "borrowed" picture...
|
|
(...) I hate to beat this to death, cause I'm sure it makes me look like an awful person, but it still rubs me the wrong way... (...) "All Gallery content is property of the uploader, unless otherwise stated." So, indirectly, the person who copied (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Another "borrowed" picture...
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <bram@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:H8qIDz.938@lugnet.com... (...) First of all, the person that have copyed your image do not claim that it is his/her work. And since the picture is not altered or renamed, and you have not made (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Artists immortalised in Lego (BBC News)
|
|
James J. Trobaugh wrote in message ... (...) Apparently, the rampant commercialism is a kind of "statement": "Cake & Neave are concerned with the appropriation of themselves and of art. They have transformed themselves into two highly loveable and (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
