 | | lugnet.alpha-team and lugnet.sports [was Re: I am not so sure on how to say this in here.]
|
|
(...) [...] (...) I agree. Any admins listening??? (...) The .build hierarchy is for categories that are not official LEGO product lines. Official product lines get top-level groups. I think that the fact that there is no lugnet.sports has more to (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Sorting
|
|
(...) You're lucky to have ice cream available in plastic tubs. In the US, ice cream comes in waxed cardboard or paper containers. --Bill. (23 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
"Øyvind Steinnes" <senniets@online.no> wrote in message news:H8Cq6z.Hw1@lugnet.com... (...) You get one with this: (URL) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
(...) So what your saying is 'I Hope lego do a bad job because I'll get the parts I want' :-). Even if that's not what you actually mean. I just buy them off Ebay, I have loads. (...) Check out this link (URL) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Concerning this new train poll
|
|
Harvey, While I agree LP is a cyberbully at times, in his defense, Rob Hendrix was the person who replied with the "you missed something" message regarding your poll. Whether or not LP contacted privately or publicly (and I missed it), usually you (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Preview of new 2003 sets - no longer on the site
|
|
(...) It looks like the items have been removed from the site (the direct links still work though) Brickset.com still has them (URL) VW (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.year.2003, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
(...) agreed under the back knob you can see the ball-pin the front knob is connected to it but the front knob seems to be enable to move in one direction only (...) i agree when i sharp a little bit the picture then it shows part-studs of engine (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Lugnet also has rules about leaks... Here is a clarification by Todd of Lugnet's TOS regarding leaks: (URL) lugnet.admin.general Frank (23 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Didn't that happen last year as well? Pedro (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) I'm not so sure about this. With the exception of Shifty bricks, I can't think of any current clone brands that do much copying from LEGO, certainly not to the extent that they'd lurk around fan sites to cull secret, leaked information. What (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Well (I do not post this as an argument for or against in the discussion), that seems to be exactly what has happened now. All sets not available to the general public yet, have been taken off the Marz Distribution site. With friendly (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Coolest LEGO Experience?
|
|
(...) Hmm, I may have a new coolest LEGO experience... This year I got several brick presents for Christmas. The first one I opened was a plastic case of used LEGO my mom had found in a yardsale. Insider were the instructions for 6391, and a bunch (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) hm...hadn't thought of that. You're right. No wonder I got the confidentiality form when I got my job:) Joe Meno (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Hi Joe - I believe a dealer catalog, obtained by and scanned by an individual who is not a dealer and placed on the internet would constitute a leak. I recall being at LEGO's office in NYC a couple years ago and having to almost beg for a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Joe, My definitions were more based on the usage at fbtb.net, where there is a strong "no discussion of leaks" policy. Bruce (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Hm. Apparently I'm a bit more liberal in my categorizations, as Bruce does have a valid point in LEGO/store communications. A counterpoint to this, though would be while the first two could constitute leaks, the Marz site would not...to a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Tough question. A leak is an item of information that is NOT meant to be released. Most, if not all of your examples that you cited were meant to be released to, at least initially, to the dealers who sell LEGO. As such, I wouldn't list these (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
Paul, The policy at fbtb is that there should be no discussion of leaks. The policy at lugnet, on the other hand, is pretty much anything goes. So feel free to discuss these here at Lugnet, but refrain from doing so on fbtb. As to your examples, the (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Understanding Leaks
|
|
Hi All, This may have been covered before, but as a relative newbie, I'd like to better understand what is meant when people talk about "leaks." I've noticed a number of folks talk about leaks in both LUGNET and FBTB, and gotten the impression that (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | BrikTrak 2002 build 220 now available.
|
|
Hi Everyone, Just wanted to let those of you who use it know that a new version of BrikTrak 2002 has been posted on the website. This version fixes a very obvious bug in previous versions; it no longer expires after December 31st 2002! (Sorry about (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.inst)
|
