 | | Re: 2005 Starship Election/Discussion
|
|
(...) It is nice to have such a job of distinction. :) (...) <snip worth reading; if you haven't go back and see> I feel this is a fine idea. I cannot think of a down-side to it, although I always encourage everyone here to post any so we can work (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | The project
|
|
Avery forwarded to me an e-mail he got from a Larry over in the General section where he first posted Michael's post. Aparently, it's better that the Alpha Centauri Project posts here under gaming. I got a question for the group, what are we going (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | ...in other news, a story
|
|
Hey there cool and froody starshippers, I have made changes to the registry to reflect Nathan's escape and Josh's joining, and I will upload them just as soon as Josh can sort out his pictures. In the meantime, I note for fans of my peculiar writing (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: 2005 Starship Election/Discussion
|
|
(...) -SNIP- Awesome, awesome cadence Richard. Very funny, as well (...) This is something I definitely agree with you on. While not something I want to do (yet, anyway), it no-doubt provides ease for some SMs. And the sector can always change its (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Power returning to Registry circuits (was Re: Starship Election\Discussion)
|
|
(...) Mmmmm. I think that this is down to me as of a few weeks ago. Hendo had forwarded me the stuff and I have not managed to get off my extensive duff. I know Josh is out there, and expect to have whatever Hendo has sent me up to date by the end (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
