|
| | Re: RulesTalk: Probes
|
| The following is forward to .gaming.starship from SM/Player Avery Christy: Hello GM, I recently read a new thread on the Lugnet message board pertaining to the probes I sent out. Due to the schedule of events unfolding in the sector, I am operating (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
| | | | Re: RulesTalk: Fog of War
|
| In lugnet.gaming.starship, John P. Henderson wrote: In lugnet.gaming.starship, Lindsay Frederick Braun wrote about options for concealing the true nature of hidden systems on ships. (...) I don't think that instances of this will be too common, so (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
| | | | Re: RulesTalk: Probes
|
| (...) -snip some- (...) Well, I think the following: Probes should only be allowed to send data, not interact with things. For instance, if it sees a valuable artifact or something, it must send the data back. It cannot go ahead and try to take the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
| | | | Re: RulesTalk: Probes
|
| (...) I think the reason I would vote in favor of not registering is the very thing you hint at in your first comment here. Probes are (or should be) rather disposable. (The player who want to use them currently has a write up with pics that say (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
| | | | Re: RulesTalk: Probes
|
| (...) Based on what I am thinking for this topic, the SMs would still have full control over the mysteries of their sectors. If probes are given stats including a rating for sensors, then SMs could use that as a guide to what a probe might be able (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
| |