| | BrikWars Stats for Animals
|
|
This past Dec 30th, I play-tested with some fellow WAMALUG (DC, VA, and MD) members some agreed statistics for Animals. Some are War Animals trained nearly as well as Troopers and much better than Scouts. Others are wild animals with instinctive (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | The one, the only - Spamcake
|
|
Amazingly, this Commonfolk's FAQ question actually includes your favorite spamcake quotes! Yummy! (URL) about LUGNET you were afraid to ask. *Really* afraid. (URL) (23 years ago, 24-Dec-01, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.faq, lugnet.general) !
|
|
| | Re: Life Before LEGO Direct
|
|
After all the recent discussions about how to clean Lego I this an interestin part of the site: (URL) Gerber <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:Go9r0u.87C@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 14-Dec-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | RE: Life Before LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) saying (URL) The Official Site (not worth visiting). I've come a long way too :) 1) (2 URLs) that's skipping a few changes/intermediate stages) --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: Life Before LEGO Direct
|
|
Whoa! This must be the motherlode of plastic PR! Now I can stop putting them in the oven to test what they are made of! From "Environment": <EXCERPT> The plastics, that the LEGO Group currently uses for its packaging, have been selected because, (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Life Before LEGO Direct
|
|
I was playing with the Internet Wayback Machine ((URL) when, just for fun, I called up LEGO.com ...the results were, if I do say so myself, horrifying: (URL) the next time someone complains about the current LEGO.com, show them this...to borrow a (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: How I should have explained this...
|
|
in article GnnAn8.Gxs@lugnet.com, Kevin Salm at kdsalm@dreamscape.com wrote on 11/30/01 9:21 PM: (...) 5839 Wardrobe: Special brick-sized "sleeves," which SHOULD fit over bricks, but are just a little too small. BONUS - "Dammit, what's going on? I (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: How I should have explained this...
|
|
(...) sets (...) and 5 (...) set 5322 Belville Accessory Pack - Jenny Craig Dietetic Foods - includes 2x2 round tiles decorated with various meal options, plus a selection of Belville fruits and vegetables like carrots, cherries, and apples. Enough (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: Got my cypress trees today, but... (My Cypress hangs slightly to the left)
|
|
(...) What
was that supposed to be some kinda pun?!? Frog
Pond
give me a break! :) --==Richard==-- (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: How I should have explained this...
|
|
(...) 10099 (S@H Exclusive) Overweight Sculpture, comes assembled, with a brick seperator. :) James (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: How I should have explained this...
|
|
(...) 098 Accessory Pack - comes with a Belville french broad loaf, a clear mug, and 5 minifigs (all with frownies) -John (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | How I should have explained this...
|
|
in article B82CE7D2.30CDF%htduc...yahoo.com, Robert M. Dye at htduck.geo@yahoo.com wrote on 11/30/01 7:37 AM: (...) Sorry, guess I didn't have enough coffee this am to explain this properly... A couple years ago, on rec.toys.lego, we regularly (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: Good grief, but it's empty in here!
|
|
in article GnM2By.L7y@lugnet.com, Markassius at mark.de.kock@NOSPAM.home.nl wrote on 11/30/01 5:23 AM: (...) A "weight loss" theme, I think. (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: Good grief, but it's empty in here!
|
|
(...) Depends on what weight should be lost: the builder or the content of the set. If the former: a set with lots of very small (1x1 plates and tiles) in a polybag, so when you open it, they are spread all over the room and the builder has to do (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Good grief, but it's empty in here!
|
|
Does anyone have any proposed sets for the new "Weight Loss" theme? Rob (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: Commonfolk's FAQ, new question
|
|
(...) Admirably answered by the (Grand) Admiral! (...) Depends if you mean "justice" or "just us" 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: Commonfolk's FAQ, new question
|
|
(...) For a long time, Spamcake existed only in the mind of TOM MCDONALD. Then he put it in his sig files on LUGNet, and it was good. Then TOM created the Spamcake Diner, and it was good. And the people were sick, but it was still good. Then came (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: Commonfolk's FAQ, new question
|
|
in article GnCzzE.16o@lugnet.com, Shiri Dori at shirid@hotmail.com wrote on 11/25/01 7:54 AM: (...) Wull, LEGO is slightly more edible than spam... Rob (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Commonfolk's FAQ, new question
|
|
Hey folks! The commonfolk's FAQ has been hibernating for a while, just to give you all a chance to relax and think up new jokes. So I've got a few new questions for y'all! Answers can be posted in reply, or emailed to me (shirid@hotmail.com). And (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun)
|
|
| | Re: The MOC that defied categorization...
|
|
(...) This is just one of the lobby cards, one of the more famous images from the film -- no motorbikes. Interestingly, the motorbikes could easily be done in Lego and CAD -- no problems at all. I chose this shot because it gave me a background I (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.fun)
|