Subject:
|
Re: Less-Common Colors
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:39:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1868 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.faq, Steve Bliss writes:
> The historical answer "green and brown (and a few other colors) can be
> easily used for military models, and LEGO is non-violent, so green and
> brown aren't allowed, except in limited situations".
How is LEGO non-violent if it produces cannons, rifles, pistols, swords,
lances, etc, etc.
Scott Smallbeck
scotts@contactics.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Less-Common Colors
|
| (...) I think the answer that Todd suggested (at the last NELUG meeting) was that swords, lances, etc., were added because they're 'historical'... and also you "can't have knights without swords"... as for the cannons, rifles, and pistols, well, I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Less-Common Colors
|
| (...) The historical answer "green and brown (and a few other colors) can be easily used for military models, and LEGO is non-violent, so green and brown aren't allowed, except in limited situations". I don't think the cost of production was a real (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
