 | | Re: Raw FAQ data format (Was: Format of FAQ items)
|
|
(...) Oh man, I'm HOT on "lynx -dump -force_html"!! It doesn't do an absolutely perfect perfect job, but it comes *so* close, and I'll bet it can get even closer by specifying a custom config file on the command line. (...) Agreed -- only &xxx; (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Raw FAQ data format (Was: Format of FAQ items)
|
|
(...) I'd like to see Latin-1 as the raw data format, with conversions to the presentation formats of: (a) HTML for webpages and (b) Latin-1/ASCII for text documents (i.e. news postings). (...) Is this a choice between (a) 7-bit ASCII with HTML (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Format of FAQ items
|
|
(...) Yes & no. 'Yes' in that a master TOC would/could appear. But 'no' in that the master TOC would just be a special case of a general-purpose sub- hierarchy TOC, which just happens to start at the top. I built one of these just for fun a couple (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
|
(...) OK, I grok that better, yes. But why was that file referring to (or including) itself, and why were the other files including files in parent directories rather than subdirectories? For definitions? (I guess you answered this below...) (...) (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: I'll volunteer for the LEGO FAQ
|
|
(...) Tags at the beginning and end of the file? That just makes processing more difficult, not easier. More syntax = more work. Less syntax = less work. I'm looking for a model with a simple but flexible design -- where individual collections Q&A (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Raw FAQ data format (Was: Format of FAQ items)
|
|
(...) Sounds mostly good. Catch my exceptions down below. (...) Or some other tool; but I agree, a well-defined subset of HTML can and should be used. (...) (Please keep in mind Jacob, that these are nits I'm picking. :-) "Newsgroups" would be more (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Format of FAQ items
|
|
(...) You mean like a master Table of Contents? Sure, okay. Question" How cautious do we want to get about creeping featuritis? :-, (...) Yep. (...) Oh, yeah. Integers are better for an enumerated value. (...) If you want to write the code for it, (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
|
(...) Would "Include" be better? (...) Sure, it looks like you're able to efficiently distinguish between a ng and a non-ng directory. (...) The top line looks good. I doubt we'd need the time-of-day stamp very often, if at all. Would it be possible (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Raw FAQ data format (Was: Format of FAQ items)
|
|
Todd Lehman (lehman@javanet.com) and Sproaticus (jsproat@geocities.com) writes lots of stuff: Guys! It sounds like you are mixing the raw data format and the presentation format. I'll try to stick to the raw data format here, and list the ideas I (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: I'll volunteer for the LEGO FAQ
|
|
(...) I don't think so. We should rather choose a separator for category levels: Category: [category] / [subcategory depth 1] / ... (...) Makes sense. (...) Lets use HTML. We can always use "lynx -dump" to generate plain text from the HTML edition. (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
