|
|
 | | Re: Scope of FAQ?
|
| (...) Start small, plan big. (...) Sure! (...) Sounds accurate to me. (...) If permission is granted explicitly, then sure -- as long as it isn't just dumped in without verifying it (since it's so old). BTW, the acronyms list, probably should IMHO (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Scope of FAQ?
|
| Todd, Jacob, all, I've been putting together an intro message (kind of a call-to-arms :-) announcing the re-start of the FAQ and a list of Q+A posted to lugnet.faq . But have we determined the scope of the FAQ? How all-encompassing will it be? Is it (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: [FAQ] Post vs. mail, claimed topics
|
| (...) OK, no problem, Larry. Thanks. :-, Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: [FAQ] Post vs. mail, claimed topics
|
| (...) Bandwidth constraints suggest to me that I should relinquish claim on these topics if someone else wants to take a crack at them, as they need doing. (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: [FAQ] Post vs. mail, claimed topics
|
| (...) What?!? You mean you don't know? :-, I actually have no clue about this one. But I am waiting to hear a good story about it. (1) :-, Cheers, - jsproat 1. HINT HINT NUDGE NUDGE, Larry. (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: [FAQ] Post vs. mail, claimed topics
|
| Let me know if I can help in any way with the DACTA info, especially what is my function. Thanks, Glen Tannenbaum (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: [FAQ] Post vs. mail, claimed topics
|
| (...) Larry, Are you still up for giving these form? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
| (...) This was my original argument for include. However, Todd already has a mechanism to figure this out on the fly. (...) Not necessarily. There are situations where you don't want to assume association with all parent directories. For example, we (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: Raw FAQ data format (Was: Format of FAQ items)
|
| (...) Since header order is important, this should work pretty well. (...) Not bad either. Wouldn't changing an included file imply that the including file has also changed? (...) ^^^...^^^ Huh? (...) But then we'd have to run the thing through a (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
