Subject:
|
Re: Scope of FAQ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Apr 1999 06:10:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1133 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.faq, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
> But have we determined the scope of the FAQ? How all-encompassing will
> it be?
Start small, plan big.
> Is it safe to say that size is not an issue?
Sure!
> Here's an excerpt from my message:
>
> "The FAQ will be patterned after the LUGNET site structure, and has room for
> Q+A on anything and everything you'd expect to see on LUGNET."
>
> I just wanted to validate my assumption. ...You know what they say about
> assumption. (1)
Sounds accurate to me.
> [question for jacob-only]
> [...]
> Would it be appropriate to use portions of the rec.toys.lego
> FAQ (2) the r.t.l Acronyms List (3), etc. assuming permission from the
> respective authors?
If permission is granted explicitly, then sure -- as long as it isn't just
dumped in without verifying it (since it's so old). BTW, the acronyms list,
probably should IMHO be split into two parts -- a LEGO specific list (BURP,
CRAPP, BT2, etc.) and a general Internet list (BTW, IIRC, IMHO, RTFM, TLA,
etc.)
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Scope of FAQ?
|
| Todd, Jacob, all, I've been putting together an intro message (kind of a call-to-arms :-) announcing the re-start of the FAQ and a list of Q+A posted to lugnet.faq . But have we determined the scope of the FAQ? How all-encompassing will it be? Is it (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
