 | | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) Even McDonald's? <duck> (URL) (...) Arctic <==> South Park + The X-Files + The Thing Adventurers <==> The Mummy + Indiana Jones + Jurassic Park Aquazone <==> Sea Quest + The Abyss DUPLO Dinosaurs <==> Land of the Lost Fabuland <=> Richard (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) ROFL... Todd, you seriously have nothing better to do than research Bradley's posts?! <grin, duck and run> (...) I buy SW because it's the best thing that ever happened to Castle. ;-) -Shiri -- I'll be on vacation between July 15th and the end (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) The McDonalds is a restaurant for the minifigs. It does not feature any goofy McDonaldsland characters. It looks good, and isn't Town Jr. So yes, I want it. (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) I don't understand how people can say this. If they were selling film then I'd agree, but I just don't see how anyone could run a restaurant in building that small. (...) This, and for the other parts, is a big reason that lots of people buy (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) I'd (...) Yeah, but if it were big it wouldn't be $9.99. (...) Star (...) sets (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) I never said that it wasn't a good set for the price. If it were bigger, and had a better selection of parts then it wouldn't be Town Jr. Ben Roller (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) My opinion that this is not Town Jr. comes from the car. It looks like a 1996 model of Lego car to me, and it has doors. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) Funny, I thought castle existed to give us space junkies cool parts to build space bases with. ;-) btw, I'm baaaaaaaack! (It's been a tough couple of weeks in the new job...time to build now.) I'll post more when I have a second or two... (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) Well you were wrong!! ;-) Welcome back :-) -Shiri -- I'll be on vacation between July 15th and the end of August... please forgive slow replies to emails/posts. (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) I'm never wrong. Mistaken on occasion, but never wrong in all my life. ;-) (...) Thanks. It's good to be back in time for Kidvention and the LUGOLA meeting...now, back to building. -Dave (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) You're both wrong. ALL themes exist to provide a background, spare parts, or bizzare loads (in extremis) for trains. And good train heads can make a prototypical train themed creation out of ANY part. ++Lar (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) No reason why we can't coexist, Lar. For each of us, all parts exist for some purpose... doesn't have to be the same one. :-) -Shiri (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: My feelings on the Mickey Mouse sets
|
|
(...) The "Town Jr.-ness" of a set doesn't have to do with its size or completeness. When was the last time LEGO produced a building with 4 sides? And most LEGO buildings are extremely cramped. The idea is to convey the purpose of the building (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
