 | | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
--snip-- (...) On that I don't think I agree. I think that volunteers (of sufficient involvement) should be given free registration. If you are volunteering then you have to attend and it is thus an expense. In the event of a loss then I imagine (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) Not sure I agree there either - speaking as an organiser of Brickvention, all the organisers, helpers, presenters, etc paid registration, it meant the difference between a small loss and a large loss. Even our Australian LEGO Ambassador paid (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) That is why I said 'of sufficient involvement' and the no hard and fast rules bit you snipped. In the case of a small convention like BV then there simply aren't the funds to let all the volunteers in for free. In that case you have to set the (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) Well, I'd rather see them all pay the fee beforehand, then be compensated (fee returned, nice lunch, whatever) after there's an indication how good the finances are (which is usually fairly apparent by the end of the public expo). ROSCO (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) That would seem like a fair compromise between risk and reward to me. Tim (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
