 | | Re: BrickWorld 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) If it takes knowing where the money goes before you volunteer, then that would be your decision to volunteer or not. Nothing wrong with that at all. What I was saying is that they are not obligated to share that information with anyone. If (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
--snip-- (...) On that I don't think I agree. I think that volunteers (of sufficient involvement) should be given free registration. If you are volunteering then you have to attend and it is thus an expense. In the event of a loss then I imagine (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) Tommy: Here, here! I agree. Everyone else: Here's where I boldly go where I probably shouldn't. Conventions cost money. There is money to pay for licensing fees, building usage, etc. If there is a profit, it (usually) does not go into the (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickWorld 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) The fact is the *DO* have to be upfront about it *IF* they want me to pay money to attend the event and how many MOCs they want me to bring. I consider any AFOL bringing a MOC to a public event, where the public is charged admission, a (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickWorld 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) This whole "profit" "non-profit" conversation is a straw man. AFAIK there have never been any "non-profit" organizations putting on LEGO fests. Non-profit is a category of organization with a specific legal status. What this whole thing boils (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld, FTX)
|
