Subject:
|
Re: Four sets reviewd, but only one good one, so be warned!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.reviews, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Sat, 5 Jan 2008 03:35:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
345 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
You raise an interesting point about the box art on the Bikini Bottom
Express: at what point can it be considered false advertising, since the
included model so obviously deviates from that pictured? On boxes of cereal,
for example, manufacturers always put a disclaimer to the effect of “Product
enlarged to show texture”; has LEGO reached the point of needing to include a
disclaimer stating, “Product rendered with CGI to cover flaws of actual
model” ? Of course, most of us would simply prefer that the model match the
box art as closely as possible. But at a minimum, perhaps LEGO needs to state
that the box art is an artistic representation of the actual product.
Incidentally, I used those same windows on a caboose of mine:
The orange panel windows it uses are from an earlier Sponge Bob set, and the
color discrepancy was still an issue then, although this latest set really
highlights it.
-Jordan Schwarz
|
Perhaps it is due to Flextronics not having the quality control that Lego did.
Why they moved production to Juarez Mexico is beyond me. Perhaps very cheap
labor, less than $2.00 an hour might be the reason. Shades of overseas clothing
sweat houses.
Check the box next time you buy a Lego. “Components made in Denmark, Austria,
Hungary, Mexico and the Czech Republic” John P
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
