| |
In lugnet.licensed.batman, Richie Dulin wrote:
| |
I’m sorry if you thought that my post was alarmist over-reaction. I could
claim your response to my post was much the same, I guess.
|
No need to apologize. I see your point about my post seeming the same...
| |
No, no. I’m saying that the scene “reminds me of some of the Abu Graib
pictures”, and that I find the scene disturbing. Not as disturbing as the Abu
Graib pictures, but disturbing nonetheless.
I’m not sure what accusations you’re claiming I’m throwing about. I find the
scene disturbing, and I don’t think its a helpful scene, or that it adds
anything to the set. It’s not something I would feel comfortable allowing
children to see. I’m not calling for a ban, or a recall, I’m just presenting
my view.
|
Your view is that children shouldn’t see the box a children’s toy comes in. It
does imply a change. In general, when I present my view to someone that they are
disturbing me, I don’t just want them to be aware of the disturbance, I am
implying that they stop disturbing me.
| |
Right. I’m not seeing the point here. Please see the “reminds me of” bit
above again.
|
I do see that point. Everyone has the right to express their opinion but you
should be aware how people will react to issues you present in doing so. Saying
a toy reminds you of a horrible political military controversy is not the same
thing as saying I didn’t like this toy because it was hard to build. It may not
have been meant as a serious implication, but it can be taken so.
| |
Best regards
Richie Dulin
|
And best regards to you-Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
71 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
