 | | Re: A few requests to enhance the System
|
|
"Ray Sanders" <rsanders@svic.net> wrote in message news:IDCo6E.JB@lugnet.com... (...) now we (...) 7-stud (...) are (...) creative (...) lengths. I (...) Even more odd is that all the studless Technic beams have holes aligned with the studs whereas (...) (20 years ago, 15-Mar-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A few requests to enhance the System
|
|
(...) Um, OK, I gota ask - if it's studless, how can you tell where the studs are to see if the holes align with them? And on a more serious note, the few "hybrid" pieces I have that are "mostly" studless *do* have the holes inbetween the studs. (...) (20 years ago, 15-Mar-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A few requests to enhance the System
|
|
(...) Tis true. What I was trying to say (I thought I did tho) was that the studless beams are typically odd 'lengths'. Since the holes are (presumably) between the (imaginary) studs, then there would be an even number of holes. In most Technic (...) (20 years ago, 15-Mar-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A few requests to enhance the System
|
|
(...) are (...) Good question! It's because on the studless beams the holes are right next to each other, whereas on the studded beams the holes have a much larger space in-between. Dave S. (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A few requests to enhance the System
|
|
(...) I must be missing something here. When I place a studless beam beside a normal Technic beam, the inter-hole spacing is exactly the same - one stud. Do you have the same parts I have? (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A few requests to enhance the System
|
|
"Brian Davis" <brdavis@iusb.edu> wrote in message news:IDHwn5.114G@lugnet.com... (...) stud. Do (...) Indeed we do! Thanks for discovering the error in my description. What I meant to say was that if you place a studless beam next to a studded beam (...) (20 years ago, 18-Mar-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
