Subject:
|
Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 May 2004 16:20:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2830 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Mark Riley wrote:
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Jimmy Park wrote:
*snip*
>
> It makes me debate the wisdom of posting great finds to the .shopping group. In
> this case:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/market/shopping/?n=11511&t=i&v=a
>
> The item was gone in about an hour and a half. I had tried probing the
> inventory by trying to add a large amount to the shopping cart and was limited
> to 99, so I assume they had at least that many (unless they've put in measures
> to get around this loophole). Anyway, it seems like some reseller probably
> gobbled them all up, though I can't be certain, of course.
>
> Mark
Good point, Mark.
Recently, I've found myself limiting my .shopping-related finds to member-only
forums like Yahoo groups and private eMail lists. At first, I reciprocated good
finds that I learned of on .shopping with similar posts, but I got the sense
that profit trolls, not interested in the hobby itself, were snapping up the
sets for resale. That's not likely the spirit of things that we're trying to
promote on LUGNET.
Anyway, build on.
Ed
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
| (...) It makes me debate the wisdom of posting great finds to the .shopping group. In this case: (URL) item was gone in about an hour and a half. I had tried probing the inventory by trying to add a large amount to the shopping cart and was limited (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
