To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 3669
3668  |  3670
Subject: 
Re: Hey Brad! Why not rerelease an *unpowered* monorail set?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:32:19 GMT
Viewed: 
2551 times
  
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:Gq1s8E.9JL@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.dear-lego, Benjamin Medinets writes:
In lugnet.dear-lego, John Grubber writes:
Hi All,
From what i have heard, the main problem with the monorail sets is • that the
motors cannot be made anymore.  Why not re-release it unpowered?  There • are
enough smart folks here that could likely jury rig something if they
wanted to,
and share the how-to with the rest of us.  And i would rather have a • push
monorail than none at all.

Heres the problem i see though:
- the track- if i recall, has teeth on its raised center bar, that mesh • with
the motors teeth, allowing it to crawl along.  The would prevent the • easy
sliding of the set, unless the section where the motor would have
contacted the
track is slightly modified (a wider opening or something?).

The lack of electronics/battery pack etc. may even be able to bring the • set
price down.

Thoughts?

Count me in. The question, as John said, is what to do in the • motor/gearing
area. All the rest is no problem. The gear is part of what keeps the motor
on the track correctly aligned, I think.

Ondrew (a fellow NILTC member) and I have had this thought after examining a
monorail motor.

Why not have the base of the motor part - the gear, the rollers, possibly
the switches, and create a socket for a Technic motor to fit in the
orientation where the axle points downward and clicks into a slot attached
to the gear?  Its mounted to the truck (motor base) with studs or pegs.
Somehow power runs from the battery box through the switches on the base and
then to the motor.

A little complex, but not too far-fetched.  It might be a solution to the
monorail motor problem.  And if the motor burns out, easily replaced, so
long as the style Techinc motor it uses is readily available.

I'm for a monorail re-relase in any way, shape or form (well, except as the
'Jack Stone Hero Transport System').  It would be cool!

-Tim (trying not to be *too* hopeful)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Hey Brad! Why not rerelease an *unpowered* monorail set?
 
(...) The motor itself is highly unlikely to be the issue. As I have mentioned before, every LEGO motor other than the micromotor I have had the opportunity to look at looks the same shape and size, and I've seen non-LEGO motors with the same shape (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hey Brad! Why not rerelease an *unpowered* monorail set?
 
(...) Count me in. The question, as John said, is what to do in the motor/gearing area. All the rest is no problem. The gear is part of what keeps the motor on the track correctly aligned, I think. (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)

20 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR