To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 3612 (-20)
  Re: What one piece would you like to see?
 
(...) This could be done with slopes that had no stud column. But somehow such pieces seem not very Lego-like. Hard for kids to work with that way. It also multiplies the number of roof system pieces something fierce! You can cut your own bricks in (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: What one piece would you like to see?
 
(...) (snip) (...) i'd like to see roof slopes that combine different pitches in one block, so one could make a roof with different pitches on different sides--example: similar to the piece mentioned above, but allow 33+45, 45+75, & 33+75 deg. (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: What one piece would you like to see?
 
(...) My apologies. I spelled it wrong. It should be: moratorium - a suspension of activity (...) Star Wars Harry Potter Bionicle Jack Stone Dinosaurs They are all loaded with new parts. Was every one of those molds necessary? From what we've been (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: What one piece would you like to see?
 
(...) ??? (...) Yes. Utter and complete. How about a new line of windows perhaps? Personally, I could think of dozens new train parts that would enhance trains greatly. Perhaps. But I think the biggest problem (...) Glut of new parts? Sorry, can't (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: What one piece would you like to see?
 
(...) My vote would be for a moritorium on new parts for at least the next 3 to 5 years. Does this sound like nonsense? Perhaps. But I think the biggest problem today isn't a lack of new parts, it's a glut of new parts. It would be so nice to see (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: What one piece would you like to see?
 
(...) some of the lego.com trains pages. as in: (URL) I would like to see the following parts: -3x3 inverted corner slopes -3x3 inside corner slopes -inverted inside corner slopes in 45 and 33 degree slopes -1x8x1 brick arches -plain panel doors (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: What one piece would you like to see?
 
"Xcalabur" <Xcalabur@rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:GoEtup.9FG@lugnet.com... (...) you too. (...) existing (...) <snip> (...) <snip there too> (...) Those 3x3 you mention are on my list (as are the others) but to be a little more (...) (23 years ago, 16-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: What one piece would you like to see?
 
(...) First thought: (URL) facet bricks, in five-high. Unfortunately, TLC didn't get interested in five-high bricks until after the corner wall (URL) come out (for that matter, I think the facet bricks themselves came out a couple years after the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Dec-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: What one piece would you like to see?
 
A double plate, singtle thickness, so that you can add to the top or bottom, i.e.: (URL) did these samples in 2 colors so you can see the double sided ness..... these are a little thicker than they're soposed to be..... Mega Bloks makes the second (...) (23 years ago, 16-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  What one piece would you like to see?
 
Hi all, I was pondering an interesting thought earlier. I'll open it to all of you too. What one (or more) piece(s), NOT yet made (i.e., no mold has ever existed for it) would you like to see LEGO make? Simple question. And no, existing parts in off (...) (23 years ago, 16-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: WHY SO LONG ON Light Gray?
 
No, you are mistaken. These ideas were forecast in the original Lego Direct plan from April 2000 that was ahead of its time. As for the "please make bleen colored googlewhatsit" posts on Dear Lego, you should understand those in the context: wishful (...) (23 years ago, 14-Dec-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: WHY SO LONG ON Light Gray?
 
Cool! The first interesting/serious ideas about bulk. So refreshing after all those "Dear Lego, I want you to make part x in colour y available in bulk"..... Duq Timothy D. Freshly <timfreshly@shaheenlaw.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: WHY SO LONG ON Light Gray?
 
"TWS Garrison" <tgarriso@math.purdue.edu> wrote in message news:Go9LDr.Jox@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) is (...) take (...) and a (...) done, (...) current (...) keeping (...) eliminating (...) prices (...) the (...) BrickBay (...) point. (...) you (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: WHY SO LONG ON Light Gray?
 
(...) Some quick math: 1,000 of any Lego piece (not mass marketed and priced minimally like the 3033) would probably cost at least $0.05 per piece, yes? That's $50 for 1,000 of the same piece. I realize that there's been inflation, etc., but that (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: MOC: Wizard's Tower
 
(...) Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was only speaking of the building itself, not the contents. An empty building as fully realized as this would be so preferrable to the hollow and vacant things that pass as buildings in the Harry (...) (23 years ago, 8-Dec-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: MOC: Wizard's Tower
 
(...) Thanks much Allan. (...) While I agree with you, in their defense, if this was an *empty* building, and followed the magic .10 per piece price, and "optimized" (where I have 2 1x4 bricks together they used a 1x8, get the idea?), this set would (...) (23 years ago, 8-Dec-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: beams
 
It looks like LEGO calls them 'Technic Beams' but BrickBay calls them 'Technic Bricks'. Over 1700 lots show up in response to this search: (URL) lugnet.technic, Allan Bedford writes: ... (...) ... (...) ... (23 years ago, 8-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: beams
 
How sad that the answer to this question isn't (URL) Seems like something I would prefer to address if I were the company. Besides the fact that it would be nice to buy direct from the source, it would also be nice to have a bit better selection (...) (23 years ago, 8-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Consumer affairs
 
Solved, just received an e-mail explaining parts will be sent during the next two weeks. Just wish it had been easier to ask for them. Pedro (23 years ago, 7-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: dear lego, please make this piece
 
(...) You mean, a divergent point? Pedro (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR