 | | Re: Juniorization Lives, and comments on marketing strategy
|
|
Okay, that was long and rant-ish. Here are the points I was trying to make, in brief: 1. The problem isn't Juniorization, per se, but the application of it. 2. In order for Lego to survive, they must lure new consumers (small children). 3. Best way (...) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Juniorization Lives, and comments on marketing strategy
|
|
(...) How many of your conversations were with small children? Of course Juniorization doesn't appeal to you or me: we're not the target audience. The problem here as I see it is LEGO is having real trouble defining the target audience for different (...) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: John Heins' article on strategy
|
|
(...) Why? It's TLC's responsibility to make a go of it. I, the consumer, owe the maker of a luxury-goods commodity absolutely nothing. I, as a fan, am more than happy to financially support the company if I feel that the price is right...if, in (...) (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Juniorization Lives, and comments on marketing strategy
|
|
(...) I saw much the same thing at TRU: 3 teenagers (I almost fainted - I'm not sure that I'd *ever* seen this) came into the aisle and were oohing and ahhing over the SW sets, but after a few remarks about how expensive the Millenium Falcon is, (...) (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: NY Times article on strategy
|
|
John, now THIS was a post that people pay attention to. The contents of this message fall outside my area of control, but I can tell you that this is the way to get the appropriate people within TLC to pay attention! Great work and thanks for the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
