 | | Re: better villians
|
|
(...) Personally, that's what always attracted me in Lego, I think it's a pitty that none of the new sets feature the happy smiley faces anymore. I'm not saying I'm against the way TLC is depicting the faces of our beloved yellow friends but (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | better villians
|
|
i think that lego should realise that people that smile all the time and live in a world where nothing goes worng just doesnt sell anymore... i think lego needs better villians... take for example the egyptian adventurers the good guys have have 4 (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Hey, don't worry about it Tim. I can certainly understand where you're coming from. Besides, I probably shouldn't have just jumped in of the blue into a hot topic in a new group that suddenly. I've been in enough forums to know that well (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Ditto to that! A brilliant and unconventional philosophy sure to make friends rather than enemies. And in the case of the Theme Gallery, where Brad has said that LEGO is indeed aware of it, I'll bet he could use some moral support from the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:Fzp04z.I2I@lugnet.com... (...) don't (...) them". (...) And (...) Yep! I've already written Brad an email about this. I was told he's in Europe right now, so a reply might be delayed. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) I have to agree with Kyle on this one, Tim. And I think my sample set of [Fortune 1000 sized company VP's and above] that I've personally had to deal with is a bit larger than yours, Tim. Going up without involving the person you're going up (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message news:Fzo378.B5@lugnet.com... (...) Ok, I apologize that I did claim that, it didn't appear to me that you were seeing the entire thing, and I made a misjudgment. (...) has (...) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture piracy at www.lego.com: nothing happened at all...
|
|
(...) Well, it is possible that they have set up a script that will automaticaly create that page, since there is no text that must be written or anything. Alan (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) <Whew!> That was huge. Okay, I'll be brief(er) this time..., just don't take it for terseness :] (After typing the post..., okay it I lied, it wasn't brief!) (...) [snip] (...) I take issue somewhat with the fact that you think I have not (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Right. That's exactly what I'm saying. I may very well want to sign it, I dunno. Have to think about it. And if I do, I will be happy to give my full name, my email address, even my estimated collection size and spend amount so far this year, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) That is... No problems if it mentions LUGNET as meeting place, etc. but have no desire for it to be labeled as "from LUGNET" or from the user community of LUGNET. Specific list of names volunteered sounds great to me. --Todd (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) I hope I don't need to say "me too" on that. :) --Todd (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) I agree! I think it is time we tell Lego how we feel. I think we should include something saying how we feel about juniorization. No one can stand it and it's a major issue. We are a major group of customers which need our views to be seen by (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:FznE60.Kxy@lugnet.com... (...) here. (...) because I (...) doubt (...) Alrighty, I think that's how it should be anyways. Thanks. -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Tim Courtney writes: <snip> Whew. Go have fun with Lego for a weekend and you can miss a lot around here. I won't take any position on whether a letter is a good idea or not because I haven't thought about it enough. However I (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:FzMtqp.7Ax@lugnet.com... (...) Whoops...sorry Suz! :) -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (URL) - Zacktron Alliance ICQ: 23951114 AIM: TimCourtne (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) c /Todd/Todd and Suzanne/ --Todd (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message news:FzMAw4.L22@lugnet.com... (...) member (...) I would counter you and say that since you have been removed as you admit, you shouldn't be coming in and arguing to the contrary. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
|
(...) demonstrate (...) That [any part in any color] will never happen (at least not with current technology). Well, it could happen if you wanted enough of the part (once they really get this going, it should be possible for someone who is willing (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) G'day Tim, First of all, thanks for your reply. As I imagine you're aware, I wasn't trying to start up any arguments, but was just trying to put another perspective on things, from someone who is both a LEGO hobbyist and a member of LUGNET, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
