|
| | Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
|
| (...) Well..... I agree with Jeff that Belville is too pink but I don't agree that pink is a bad color. I think it is great in town and work really well putting details and highlights on Victorian style buildings. I personally think that the more (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| | | | Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
|
| (...) Agreed. Pink pieces are gross, and can't be reused in a normal town without being noticed for being recycled Barbie-esque sets. If placed next to any other colour, it looks wrong. (...) The dead Paradisa line was pretty good to build. My (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| | | | Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
|
| (...) Unfortunately, your perception isn't shared by a lot of non-AFOL parents. They look at, say, the LEGO X-wing, and see the $30 price tag, then they look at the Hasbro X-wing which comes in a box about 4 times as large for the same price, and (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
|
| (...) It depends, of course on what set you are talking about. The 1200 piece basic set is something around US$20 at toys 'r us. (I don't know what it is outside of the US.) The thematic sets are far more expensive, but I think LEGO has much higher (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
|
| (Removing .loc.au because it's not really Aussie-specific anymore, if it ever was) (...) Well, Todd did some great things with Duplo dinos...but I agree, there's not much *reason* to make them work together. (...) I wouldn't mind seeing stuff aimed (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| |