 | | Re: Knights’ Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
|
(...) That's a compliment, right? (20 years ago, 17-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Knights’ Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
|
Knight's Kingdom "knights" belong in the movie Krull or ROM comics. F (20 years ago, 17-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Buckets on the Brain
|
|
(...) When the bucket was stamped/molded. Many companies use them. (...) It is indeed the new colors. (...) All discontinued. But still massive amounts to be found. None have been repackaged or renumbered as far as I know. Besides if they were, I (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Buckets on the Brain
|
|
If this issue has already been addressed, then please forgive me. I've searched the Lugnet set database but could not find the answer to my question. I realize that this issue could EASILY be addressed by simply buying one of the sets in question, (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.color, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Dear LEGO, do you realize what is happening?
|
|
I'm concerned about the community. I've read, in the past years, many threads about how people didn't like this line or that decision, but never as much as in the last few months. One would think the color change is the only reason. It certainly is (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
In lugnet.general, Nathan Wells wrote: (snip) see (URL) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Knights' Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
|
(...) I agree with your statement. What I disagree with is those who complain it's TLC's fault when their creations aren't "real" enough. -Orion (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Knights' Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
|
(...) Fooey. I enjoy the challange of trying to build something realistic in my medium. And I choose LEGO as my medium. Jason Spears | (URL) BrickCentral> | (URL) MichLUG> (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: wishin' on a star
|
|
(...) This part has already been spotted, but it's not quite the same design. She asked for a 3x3 33 degree triple corner slope (wow, I hadn't really noticed how 3-centric that part was...), but the one shown in the scan is a 4x4 18 degree triple (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: wishin' on a star
|
|
Hey, It looks like your part 22 is found in the new Titan XP set (scan provided by IanGreg: (URL) ): Scroll down in the fifth column from the left: (URL) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
|
| |
| | just a silly question re: LEGO & AFOLS
|
|
Dear LEGO: Is there anything you learned about the AFOL market in the last few years that really surprised you, really 'knocked your socks off'? JohnG, GMLTC (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
(...) Hi Marlon, For the greatest part, you are right of course. For me, sets are only a bunch of useful (or useless) parts. So, it doesn’t matter in which form LEGO put it in a box. And I can take it or leave it. Their only mistake was the change (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: wishin' on a star
|
|
(...) Well, a lot of the pieces you showed would make sense to complete the Lego system. BUT we are talking of TLC, so waiting for a solution that would make sense is most propably a waste of time. Unless of course they would need one of the bricks (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment)
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
(...) Thanx to everyone who replied! I'm glad to hear from those on both sides of the fence... After making my post I started thinking more about what Lugnet is for, and voicing likes and dislikes is amongst them... so I hope I didn't rub anyone the (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Knights’ Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
|
(...) What you have to look at is the age ranges. Harry Potter, which is similar to older castle in complexity and use of parts, is 8+,7+,8+. Knights Kingdom is 5+,6+,7+. Its one step up from Jack Stone. If you want to compare the old castle stuff (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
Wow, that's some pretty good stuff... And I can agree with you about most of it, but, liking JarJar? Are you insane? Mark (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: wishin' on a star
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) SNIP (...) my wishes: (URL) & mirrored & other mixed slopes (URL) 1x2 technic liftarm-snot yay! (URL) snot yay! thanks! Jeff (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
(...) Well, as the one who initiated the whole </dear-lego/?n=4810 Knights Kingdom rant> I feel the need to defend myself lest I be labeled part of the problem rather than the solution. I've written my fair share of </dear-lego/?n=4295 shining (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
(...) Agreed. I'd like to mention: a) 4496 Tub. Same price, more actual brick material. Less 1x1 and 1x2's over the 4107. b) 10152 Maersk Ship. Amazing set, great pieces. c) The entire 2003 line. Calum (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Knights’ Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
|
I'm somewhat of a lurker, but I saw this as a message I just couldn't ignore. I'll agree with Felix that the new sets, especially the Grand Tournament one, just don't live up to the old castle standards. I recall being disappointed with the first (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
