To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.db.invOpen lugnet.db.inv in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Database / Set Inventories / 299
298  |  300
Subject: 
Re: 3033 1200-Piece Blue Bucket
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.db.inv
Date: 
Wed, 1 Mar 2000 06:40:44 GMT
Viewed: 
818 times
  
Ok, for multiple sets I can see how it helps.  I just hate to give up
another field in that 80-character line.  I guess I should just give
up on the 80-character line....

John C.

In lugnet.db.inv, Steve Bliss writes:
[SNIP]

It could help anyone dealing with parting-out multiple copies of the same set.
Especially if they are selling or trading parts out of a set, and want to
'touch' each set as few times as possible.

For example, in my last parts sale, I had the following sets:

: 6 copies of 6441 Deep Reef Refuge <http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=6441>
: 3 copies of 8250 Search Sub <http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=8250- • 1>
: 7 copies of 7111 Droid Fighter <http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=7111>

To save some time on packing, I opened all the sets, left the pieces in the
baggies, and put identical baggies together.  That way, if someone had bought
all of the tan 3x3 round-corner plates, I could easily get all the pieces, once
I found one of the bags.

To save even more time, I packed several orders at once (usually, as many as I
had ready to be packed).  That way, I could grab one set of baggies, and check
all the orders to see if there were pieces in those baggies for the orders.  If
I packed orders individually, I would have had to 'touch' each set of baggies
more times, once for each order.

This wasn't a perfect system, more of an art than a science.  But it was better
than the alternatives.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 3033 1200-Piece Blue Bucket
 
(...) Actually, I had keyed "bag1", "bag2", etc. But I figured the "bag" prefix was redundant (at least in this case). If I was inventorying 8448, where there are several boxes, each with multiple bags, I'd use a notation like "box1.bag3", or (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.db.inv)

11 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR